Evaluation of Atrial Electromechanical Delay to Predict Atrial Fibrillation in Hemodialysis Patients


Gunes H., Sokmen A., Kaya H., Gungor O., Kerkutluoglu M., Guzel F. B., ...Daha Fazla

MEDICINA-LITHUANIA, cilt.54, sa.4, 2018 (SCI-Expanded) identifier identifier identifier

  • Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
  • Cilt numarası: 54 Sayı: 4
  • Basım Tarihi: 2018
  • Doi Numarası: 10.3390/medicina54040058
  • Dergi Adı: MEDICINA-LITHUANIA
  • Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), Scopus
  • Anahtar Kelimeler: atrial electromechanical delay, atrial fibrillation, hemodialysis, CARDIOVASCULAR OUTCOMES, KIDNEY-DISEASE, DIALYSIS, PREVALENCE, ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY, ASSOCIATION, POPULATION, MORTALITY, THERAPY, TIMES
  • Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart Üniversitesi Adresli: Hayır

Özet

Background and objective: Prevalence of atrial fibrillation is higher in hemodialysis patients as compared to the general population. Atrial electromechanical delay is known as a significant predictor of atrial fibrillation. In this study, we aimed to reveal the relationship between atrial electromechanical delay and attacks of atrial fibrillation. Materials and methods: The study included 77 hemodialysis patients over 18 years of age giving written consent to participate in the study. The patients were divided into two groups based on the results of 24-h Holter Electrocardiogram (Holter ECG) as the ones having attacks of atrial fibrillation and the others without any attack of atrial fibrillation. Standard echocardiographic measurements were taken from all patients. Additionally, atrial conduction times were measured by tissue Doppler technique and atrial electromechanical delays were calculated. Results: Intra- and interatrial electromechanical delay were found as significantly lengthened in the group of patients with attacks of atrial fibrillation (p = 0.03 and p < 0.001 respectively). The optimal cut-off time for interatrial electromechanical delay to predict atrial fibrillation was >21 ms with a specificity of 79.3% and a sensitivity of 73.7% (area under the curve 0.820; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.716-0.898). In the multivariate logistic regression model, interatrial electromechanical delay (odds ratio = 1.230; 95% CI, 1.104-1.370; p < 0.001) and hypertension (odds ratio = 4.525; 95% CI, 1.042-19.651; p = 0.044) were also associated with atrial fibrillation after adjustment for variables found to be statistically significant in univariate analysis and correlated with interatrial electromechanical delay. Conclusions: Interatrial electromechanical delay is independently related with the attacks of atrial fibrillation detected on Holter ECG records in hemodialysis patients.