The influence of molar incisor hypomineralization-related enamel defects in anterior teeth on peer perception of smile esthetics in children and adolescents


Creative Commons License

Sezer B., Akbaş Z. S., Kara A. T.

JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, cilt.163, 2025 (SCI-Expanded) identifier identifier identifier

  • Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
  • Cilt numarası: 163
  • Basım Tarihi: 2025
  • Doi Numarası: 10.1016/j.jdent.2025.106117
  • Dergi Adı: JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY
  • Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), Scopus, Academic Search Premier, Aerospace Database, CAB Abstracts, CINAHL, Communication Abstracts, Metadex, Veterinary Science Database, Civil Engineering Abstracts
  • Anahtar Kelimeler: Enamel defects, Esthetic dentistry, Molar incisor hypomineralization, Peer perception, Smile esthetics
  • Açık Arşiv Koleksiyonu: AVESİS Açık Erişim Koleksiyonu
  • Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet

Özet

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the influence of enamel defects in anterior teeth associated with molar incisor hypomineralization (MIH) on peer perception of smile esthetics in children and adolescents. Methods: A total of 288 children and adolescents aged 10-14 years from both public and private schools participated. Each participant evaluated standardized photographs of peers' smiles, either showing MIH-related anterior enamel opacities or digitally altered to appear defect-free. Participants rated each image across four psychosocial domains: athletic ability, social competence, leadership potential, and academic performance. Independent-sample t-tests were used to compare ratings between smile types, and General Linear Models (GLMs) were applied to analyze the influence of evaluator-related variables such as age and gender. Results: Digitally modified smiles received significantly higher ratings than unedited images for athletic ability (59.72 f 0.86 vs. 50.94 f 0.89; mean difference = 8.78, p < 0.001), social competence (52.62 f 0.80 vs. 43.78 f 0.81; difference = 8.84, p < 0.001), leadership potential (64.15 f 0.84 vs. 56.44 f 0.86; difference = 7.71, p < 0.001), and academic performance (62.52 f 0.79 vs. 58.36 f 0.83; difference = 4.16, p < 0.001). GLM analysis indicated that evaluator age and gender were stronger predictors than smile type, with older children and female evaluators demonstrating greater esthetic sensitivity (p < 0.05). Conclusion: MIH-related enamel defects in anterior teeth negatively affect peer perception, but evaluator-related factors such as age and gender play an important role in shaping social judgments. Clinical significance: This study demonstrates that enamel defects in anterior teeth caused by MIH not only present a clinical challenge but also influence how children are perceived by their peers in terms of social attributes.