Interaction and multi-objective effects ofmultiple non-thermal treatments of sourcherry juice: pesticide removal, microbialinactivation, and quality preservation


Akdemir Evrendilek G., Keskin Uslu E. , Gölge Ö.

JOURNAL OF THE SCIENCE OF FOOD AND AGRICULTURE, vol.100, pp.1653-1661, 2019 (Journal Indexed in SCI)

  • Publication Type: Article / Article
  • Volume: 100
  • Publication Date: 2019
  • Doi Number: 10.1002/jsfa.10178
  • Title of Journal : JOURNAL OF THE SCIENCE OF FOOD AND AGRICULTURE
  • Page Numbers: pp.1653-1661

Abstract

The consumption of pesticide‐contaminated sour cherries as fruit or juice has become a major health concern, and so the search for alternative processing technologies, such as pulsed electric fields (PEF), ozone (O), and ultrasonication (US) has intensified. The objectives of this experimental study of sour cherry juice were fourfold: (1) to quantify the removal efficiency of new processing technologies (PEF, O, US), and their combinations, for the pesticides chlorpyrifos ethyl, τ‐fluvalinate, cyprodinil, pyraclostrobin, and malathion; (2) to detect their impact on physical, bioactive, and sensory properties; (3) to determine their microbial inactivation levels for Escherichia coli O157:H7, Bacillus cereusPseudomonas syringae subs. Syringae, and Penicillum expansum; and (4) to jointly optimize multiple responses of physical, quality, and sensory properties, pesticides, and microbial inactivation. Except for all the O treatments, the physical, bioactive and sensory properties of sour cherry juice were not adversely affected by the treatments. The joint optimization suggested PEF1 (24.7 kV cm−1 for 327 μs), PEF2 (24.7 kV cm−1 for 655 μs), PEF2 + O + US, US, and PEF2 + O as the five best treatments. PEF2 + O + US best achieved both pesticide removal and microbial inactivation.PEF2 + O + US provided promising reductions in pesticide and microbial loads